[Ensure you have all the info you need in these unprecedented times. Subscribe now.]
Boeing Co. is plotting a low-key comeback for the 737 Max, the grounded jetliner that has spent almost two years engulfed in controversy and tragedy after two fatal crashes, said people familiar with the matter.
There won’t be an advertising blitz touting the much-anticipated return of Boeing’s best-selling jet from a global flying ban, said the people, who asked not to be named because the deliberations are private. The company has also dropped plans to fly a rented Max festooned with its corporate logo around the globe to woo customers and journalists.
Boeing opted for a more muted approach after a public scolding by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and private criticism from airlines over its handling of the Max crisis last year, the people said. With its reputation in tatters, Boeing is leaning on FAA, pilots and airlines to assure travelers that the revamped Max is safe to fly. FAA boss Steve Dickson, a licensed 737 pilot, is underscoring that message Sept. 30 by flying a Max himself.
“They need to put their heads down, be disciplined and start racking up safe flight hours,” Jeff Eller, who heads a crisis-response firm in Austin, Texas, said of Boeing. “They dug a hole, they have to fill the hole and then they have to rise above the hole.”
The tail of a Boeing 737 Max 9 jetliner sits at the company’s manufacturing facility in Renton, Wash., in March 2017. (David Ryder/Bloomberg News)
Eller pointed to parallels to the less-is-more strategy that helped Firestone emerge from scandal and tragedy in the early 2000s. He advised the company as it responded to accidents involving Ford Motor Co.’s Explorer that killed 271 people and sparked the largest tire recall in U.S. history.
Boeing said it’s following “the lead of global regulators on the rigorous process they have laid out for certifying the 737 Max to return it safely to commercial service. We also are working to provide all necessary support to our customers around the world as they plan a safe and smooth return to service.”
Many travelers can’t tell a Boeing aircraft from an Airbus SE plane, said aviation consultant Robert Mann. But when a jet’s brand has been as badly damaged as the Max’s, airlines have to walk a fine line between being upfront and alarming travelers. Over the years, carriers have found that consumers are willing to move on if the aircraft proves to be safe and reliable, he said.
“If you have to answer people’s questions, answer them,” Mann said. He worked at American when the airline and McDonnell Douglas Corp. reintroduced the DC-10 jetliner with little fuss following a 1979 grounding, after authorities linked a crash that killed 273 people to improper maintenance.
The Max debacle, by contrast, involved flawed engineering assumptions in the design of the plane. The grounding of Boeing’s workhorse single-aisle jetliner sparked worldwide fury at a pillar of U.S. industry. British tabloids dubbed it the “death jet.”
Boeing was slow to apologize and acknowledge mistakes with software linked to the two crashes, which killed 346 people, and the company’s self-inflicted damage worsened as crucial information trickled out over months. Victims’ family members — a group that includes consumer advocate Ralph Nader — vowed to block the Max’s return.
A year ago, Boeing had small armies of consultants providing sometimes conflicting advice on crisis management and branding, said the people familiar with the matter. The company plotted a sweeping marketing campaign that even scripted talking points and videos that airlines could use with their pilots, front-line employees and passengers.
But as the public clamor deepened, the U.S. Max operators pushed back, concerned the messaging was tone-deaf. Boeing eventually scrapped the effort.
Now, airlines don’t want to reignite the Max controversy at a time when, according to Google Trends, consumers are less focused on the plane. The coronavirus pandemic and U.S. presidential election are dominating public attention, giving Boeing a chance to reset expectations for its jet.
The campaign starts with the FAA’s Dickson, who is also working to undo some of the damage to his agency’s standing after it signed off on the Max’s initial design. Shortly after taking over at FAA last year, he vowed to fly the jet himself before it’s approved for the public.
He’s set to fulfill that promise Sept. 30 — with a Boeing test pilot at his side — after taking the training course that is expected to be approved for pilots returning to the plane.
What does it take to be a commercial driver, and what are schools doing to train them? Host Michael Freeze speaks with Chris Thropp of Sage Truck Driving School and Don Lefeve of the Commercial Vehicle Training Association. Hear a snippet, above, and get the full program by going to RoadSigns.TTNews.com.
Dickson’s plane lifted off from Seattle’s Boeing Field shortly before 9 a.m. local time, according to FlightRadar24. Afterward, the former Delta Air Lines Inc. executive and pilot is also expected to brief reporters on the agency’s progress in reviewing changes made to the Max.
While FAA wants to reassure the public that the plane is safe, it has also taken contentious stands on issues involving Boeing in the past year, including a refusal to let company employees sign off on jets prior to delivery. A bipartisan House bill to tighten FAA authority over aircraft certification was passed by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Sept. 30, clearing it to be considered by the full chamber.
U.S. airlines are still fine-tuning their plans to reintroduce the Max to their own staff and the flying public. Since the grounding is expected to be lifted first in the U.S., their efforts to win over fliers will be closely watched.
The Allied Pilots Association, representing aviators at American, is taking an independent stance from the carrier on plans to restore passenger confidence.
“When the Max is fixed, fully vetted by all stakeholders, and we are robustly trained, we will be at the flight deck welcoming passengers,” said Dennis Tajer, a union spokesman. “We’re not brand ambassadors, we are the last line of defense for passenger safety and that’s not a marketing campaign.”
Julie Johnsson, Mary Schlangenstein and Alan Levin were the primary contributors to this report.
Want more news? Listen to today’s daily briefing: